4.6 Article

Identification of higher brain centres that may encode the cardiorespiratory response to exercise in humans

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 533, Issue 3, Pages 823-836

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00823.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1. Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to identify the neuroanatomical correlates underlying 'central command' during imagination of exercise under hypnosis, in order to uncouple central command from peripheral feedback. 2. Three cognitive conditions were used: condition I, imagination of freewheeling downhill on a bicycle (no change in heart rate, HR, or ventilation, (V) over dot(I)): condition II, imagination of exercise, cycling uphill (increased HR by 12 % and (V) over dot(I) by 30 % of the actual exercise response): condition III, volitionally driven hyperventilation to match that achieved in condition II (no change in HR). 3. Subtraction methodology created contrast A (II minus I) highlighting cerebral areas involved in the imagination of exercise and contrast B (III minus I) highlighting areas activated in the direct volitional control of breathing (n = 4 for both; 8 scans per subject). End-tidal P-CO2 (P-ET,P-CO2) was held constant throughout PET scanning. 4. In contrast 8, significant activations were seen in the right dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex, supplementary motor areas (SMA), the right premotor area (PMA), superolateral sensorimotor areas, thalamus, and bilaterally in the cerebellum. In contrast B, significant activations were present in the SMA and in lateral sensorimotor cortical areas. The SMA/PMA, dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex and the cerebellum are concerned with volitional/motor control, including that of the respiratory muscles. 5. The neuroanatomical areas activated suggest that a significant component of the respiratory response to 'exercise', in the absence of both movement feedback and an increase in CO2 production, can be generated by what appears to be a behavioural response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available