4.6 Article

Transgenic cystic fibrosis mice exhibit reduced early clearance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the respiratory tract

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 166, Issue 12, Pages 7410-7418

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.12.7410

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR00168] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL58398] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [AI22806] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) has been proposed to be an epithelial cell receptor for Pseudomonas aeruginosa involved in bacterial internalization and clearance from the lung. We evaluated the role of CFTR in clearing A aeruginosa from the respiratory tract using transgenic CF mice that carried either the Delta F508 Cftr allele or an allele with a Cftr stop codon (S489X). Intranasal application achieved P. aeruginosa lung infection in inbred C57BL/6 Delta F508 Cftr mice, whereas Delta F508 Cftr and S489X Cftr outbred mice required tracheal application of the inoculum to establish lung infection. CF mice showed significantly less ingestion of LPS-smooth P. aeruginosa by lung cells and significantly greater bacterial lung burdens 4.5 h postinfection than C57BL/6 wild-type mice. Microscopy of infected mouse and rhesus monkey tracheas clearly demonstrated ingestion of P. aeruginosa by epithelial cells in wild-type animals, mostly around injured areas of the epithelium. Desquamating cells loaded with A aeruginosa could also be seen in these tissues. No difference was found between CF and wild-type mice challenged with an LPS-rough mucoid isolate of P. aeruginosa lacking the CFTR ligand. Thus, transgenic CF mice exhibit decreased clearance of P. aeruginosa and increased bacterial burdens in the lung, substantiating a key role for CFTR-mediated bacterial ingestion in lung clearance of P. aeruginosa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available