4.7 Article

Cosmological origin of the lowest metallicity halo stars

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 324, Issue 2, Pages 484-490

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04346.x

Keywords

stars : luminosity function, mass function; Galaxy : abundances; Galaxy : formation; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explore the predictions of the standard hierarchical clustering scenario of galaxy formation, regarding the numbers and metallicities of PopIII stars that are likely to be found within our Galaxy today. By PopIII we refer to stars formed at large redshift (z > 4), with low metallicities ([Z/Z.] < -2.5) and in small systems (total mass 2 x 10(8) M.) that are extremely sensitive to stellar feedback, and which through a prescribed merging history end up becoming part of the Milky Way today. An analytic, extended Press-Schechter formalism is used to obtain the mass functions of haloes which will host PopIII stars at a given redshift, and which will end up in Milky Way sized systems today. Each of these is modelled as a mini-galaxy, with a detailed treatment of the dark halo structure, angular momentum distribution, final gas temperature and disc instabilities, all of which determine the fraction of the baryons that are subject to star formation. The use of new primordial metallicity stellar evolutionary models allows us to trace the history of the stars formed, and give accurate estimates of their expected numbers today and their location in L/L. versus T/K Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagrams. A first comparison with observational data suggests that the initial mass function (IMF) of the first stars was increasingly high-mass weighted towards high redshifts, levelling off at z greater than or similar to 9 at a characteristic stellar mass scale m(s) = 10-15 M..

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available