4.6 Article

Identification of apocalmodulin and Ca2+-calmodulin regulatory domain in skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channel, ryanodine receptor

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 276, Issue 25, Pages 22579-22585

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M102729200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR18687] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fusion proteins and full-length mutants were generated to identify the Ca2(+)-free (apoCaM) and Ca2(+)bound (CaCaM) calmodulin binding sites of the skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channel/ryanodine receptor (RyR1). [S-35]Calmodulin (CaM) overlays of fusion proteins revealed one potential Ca2+-dependent (aa 3553-3662) and one Ca2+-independent (aa 4302-4430) CaM binding domain. W3620A or L3624D substitutions almost abolished completely, whereas V3619A or L3624A substitutions reduced [S-35]CaM binding to fusion protein (aa 3553-3662). Three full-length RyR1 single-site mutants (V3619A, W3620A,L3624D) and one deletion mutant (Delta 4274-4535) were generated and expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. L3624D exhibited greatly reduced [35S]CaM binding affinity as indicated by a lack of noticeabIe binding of apoCaM and CaCaM (nanomolar) and the requirement of CaCaM (micromolar) for the inhibition of RyR1 activity. W3620A bound CaM (nanomolar) only in the absence of Ca2+ and did not show inhibition of RyR1 activity by 3 muM CaCaM. V3619A and the deletion mutant bound apoCaM and CaCaM at levels compared with wild type. V3619A activity was inhibited by CaM with IC50 similar to 200 nM, as compared with IC50 similar to 50 nM for wild type and the deletion mutant. [S-35]CaM binding experiments with sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles suggested that apoCaM and CaCaM bind to the same region of the native RyR1 channel complex. These results indicate that the intact RyR1 has a single CaM binding domain that is shared by apoCaM and CaCaM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available