4.6 Article

Identification of a dominant negative homeodomain mutation in Rieger syndrome

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 276, Issue 25, Pages 23034-23041

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M008592200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY12384] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE13076] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the PITX2 bicoid-like homeobox gene cause Rieger syndrome. Rieger syndrome is an autosomal-dominant human disorder characterized by glaucoma as well as dental hypoplasia, mild craniofacial dysmorphism, and umbilical stump abnormalities, PITX2 has also been implicated in the development of multiple organs and left-right asymmetry in the body plan. The PITX2 homeodomain has a lysine at position 50, which has been shown to impart the bicoid-type (TAATCC) DNA binding specificity to other homeodomain proteins. A mutation (R88E), found in a Rieger syndrome patient, changes this lysine to glutamic acid. We were intrigued by the relatively pronounced phenotypic consequences of this R88E mutation, In the initial analyses, the mutant protein appeared to simply be inactive, with essentially no DNA binding and transactivation activities and, unlike the wild type protein, with an inability to synergize with another transcription factor, Pit-1. However, when the K88E DNA was cotransfected with wild type PITX2, analogous to the patient genotype, the K88E mutant suppressed the synergism of wild type PITX2 with Pit-1. In contrast, a different PITX2 homeodomain mutant, T68P, which is also defective in DNA binding, transactivation, and Pit-1 synergism activities, did not suppress the wild type synergism with Pit-1. These results describe the first dominant negative missense mutation in a homeodomain and support a model that may partially explain the phenotypic variation within Rieger syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available