4.6 Article

Expression of membrane-bound NPP-type ecto-phosphodiesterases in rat podocytes cultured at normal and high glucose concentrations

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.10.144

Keywords

Ecto-enzyme; Insulin resistance; Phosphodiesterase; Podocytes; P2-receptors; Pyrophosphatase

Funding

  1. Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family (E-NPPs) contains two membrane-bound members: E-NPP1 and E-NPP3. These enzymes mediate hydrolysis of extracellular nucleotides and their abnormal expression may affect intracellular signal transduction pathways, leading to cellular dysfunction, e.g., insulin resistance. Podocytes are insulin-dependent glomerular epithelial cells that regulate the glomerular filtration rate. Pathology of podocytes is a hallmark of diabetic nephropathy. Here, we investigated the expressions of E-NPP1 and E-NPP3 and activity of E-NPP enzymes in rat podocytes cultured with 5 mM (NG) or 30 mM glucose (HG). Insulin resistance was determined by measuring changes in [1,2-H-3]-deoxy-D-glucose uptake in response to insulin. mRNAs of E-NPP1 and E-NPP3 were detected within podocytes. The E-NPP expressions were confirmed at the protein level using western blot and immunofluorescence techniques. At NG, insulin (300 nM, 3 min) increased glucose uptake 1.5-fold: however, this effect was abolished at HG. The protein expressions of E-NPP1 and E-NPP3 were not affected at HG. The E-NPP activities were 24.68 +/- 0.72 and 26.51 +/- 1.55 nmol/min/mg protein at NG and HG, respectively. In conclusion, ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1 and 3 are expressed on podocytes, but changes in expression of these enzymes are most likely not involved in etiology of insulin resistance in podocytes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available