4.6 Review

Imaginary-time replica formalism study of a quantum spherical p-spin-glass model -: art. no. 014403

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.014403

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study a quantum extension of the spherical p-spin-glass model using the imaginary-time replica formalism. We solve the model numerically and we discuss two analytical approximation schemes that capture most of the features of the solution. The phase diagram and the physical properties of the system are determined in thermodynamic equilibrium and under conditions of marginal stability. In both cases, the phase diagram consists of two qualitatively different regions. If the transition temperature is higher than a certain value T*, quantum effects are qualitatively irrelevant and the phase transition is second order, as in the classical case. When quantum fluctuations depress the transition temperature below T*, the transition becomes first order. The susceptibility is discontinuous and shows hysteresis across the first-order line. This behavior is reminiscent of that observed in the dipolar Ising spin-glass LiHoxY1-xF4 in an external transverse magnetic field. We discuss the thermodynamics and the stationary dynamics of both states. The spectrum of magnetic excitations of the equilibrium spin-glass stare is gapped, leading to an exponentially small specific heat at low temperatures. That of the marginally stable state is gapless and its specific heat varies linearly with temperature, as generally observed in glasses at low temperature. We show that the properties of the marginally stable state are closely related to those obtained in studies of the real-time dynamics of the system weakly coupled to a quantum thermal bath. Finally, we discuss a possible application of our results to the problem of polymers in random media.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available