4.6 Article

Quantitative analysis of sitagliptin using the 19F-NMR method: a universal technique for fluorinated compound detection

Journal

ANALYST
Volume 140, Issue 1, Pages 280-286

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4an01681e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31470916]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0816]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  4. Open Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University [SKLNMKF201307]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To expand the application scope of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technology in quantitative analysis of pharmaceutical ingredients, F-19 nuclear magnetic resonance (F-19-NMR) spectroscopy has been employed as a simple, rapid, and reproducible approach for the detection of a fluorine-containing model drug, sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate (STG). ciprofloxacin (Cipro) has been used as the internal standard (IS). Influential factors, including the relaxation delay time (d1) and pulse angle, impacting the accuracy and precision of spectral data are systematically optimized. Method validation has been carried out in terms of precision and intermediate precision, linearity, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ), robustness, and stability. To validate the reliability and feasibility of the F-19-NMR technology in quantitative analysis of pharmaceutical analytes, the assay result has been compared with that of H-1-NMR. The statistical F-test and student t-test at 95% confidence level indicate that there is no significant difference between these two methods. Due to the advantages of F-19-NMR, such as higher resolution and suitability for biological samples, it can be used as a universal technology for the quantitative analysis of other fluorine-containing pharmaceuticals and analytes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available