4.6 Article

Preactivated monocytes from hypertensive patients as a factor for atherosclerosis?

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 157, Issue 1, Pages 151-160

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9150(00)00674-2

Keywords

human monocytes; essential hypertension; human umbilical vein endothelial cells; cell adhesion; chemiluminescence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, we reported our findings regarding the elevated secretion patterns of proinflammatory cytokines obtained from peripheral blood monocytes of hypertensive patients. To investigate the direct impact of these preactivated monocytes, the adhesion of monocytes from normal controls and hypertensive patients to vascular endothelial cell monolayers was determined spontaneously and after in vitro stimulation with either lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or angiotensin II (Ang II), with or without preincubation with the ATI receptor antagonist eprosartan. Peripheral blood monocytes from 20 patients and 20 healthy individuals were isolated by density gradient centrifugation and plastic adherence: endothelial cells were obtained from human umbilical cords by collagenase digestion. The adhesion was determined by an assay with Cr-51-radiolabeled monocytes. Oxygen species release induced by phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) as a further activation marker was analyzed for monocytes and HUVEC by chemiluminescence (CL). Spontaneous adhesion of monocytes from patients: and the: adhesion after stimulation with Ang II were significantly increased compared with normal controls (P < 0.05). Preincubation with eprosartan diminished the adhesion in both groups to comparable levels. In monocytes, peak levels of PMA and Ang II induced CL analysis were significantly higher in patients (P<0.005). These data indicate that preactivated monocytes from hypertensives may be of pathogenic importance in atherosclerosis. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights: reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available