4.6 Article

Congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles associated with cortical dysplasia and maldevelopment of the basal ganglia

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages 1313-1322

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00582-6

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles (CFEOM) is a rare condition that has been traditionally regarded as a primary eye muscle disease. Recent studies, however, suggest that CFEOM may be the result of a primary neuropathy with secondary myopathic changes. Purpose: To describe a previously unrecognized association between congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles and structural abnormalities of the brain. Design: Small case series. Methods: Detailed clinical examinations and neuroradiologic studies were performed on the three affected family members. In addition, genetic analysis of the family was performed. Results: The three affected family members, mother and two children, have the ocular features of 'classic' congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles, All showed dilation of the left lateral ventricle secondary to hypoplasia of the body and tail of the ipsilateral caudate nucleus. There was fusion of an enlarged caudate nucleus head with the underlying putamen, Both children showed widespread bilateral cortical dysplasia, Genetic analysis of the family was inconclusive but consistent with linkage to the CFEOM1 locus on chromosome 12, Chromosomal analysis of the affected individuals did not show evidence of a deletion of chromosome 12 and haplotype analysis was not suggestive of a microdeletion. Conclusions: Cerebral cortical and basal ganglia maldevelopment can be found in individuals with CFEOM, This suggests that neuroimaging should be considered in the initial diagnostic evaluation of these patients, particularly if there is developmental delay, Ophthalmology 2001;108:1313-1322 (C) 2001 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available