4.2 Article

Corrective osteotomy for symptomatic increased ulnar tilt of the distal end of the radius

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
Volume 26A, Issue 4, Pages 722-732

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.26033

Keywords

increased ulnar inclination; distal radius; wrist deformity in the anteroposterior plane; adaptive carpal malalignment; radial osteotomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Twelve wrists in 10 patients with a mean ape of 23.6 years were treated for symptomatic increased ulnar inclination of the joint surface with corrective osteotomy of the radius. Diagnoses included mild ulnar dysplasia, posttraumatic deformity, Madelung's disease, and multiple hereditary exostosis. All patients had radial-sided wrist pain and an ulnarly displaced are of radioulnar deviation. Preoperative radiographs showed excessive ulnar inclination of the distal radius, ulnar carpal translation, adaptive carpal malalignment and frequent distal radioulnar joint incongruency. The patients had decreased pain and improved wrist function at a mean of 5.1 years (range, 2-10 years) after surgery. Average radial deviation changed from 3 degrees to 16 degrees and ulnar deviation from 48 degrees to 29 degrees; flexion/extension and pronosupination remained unchanged. Realignment of the wrist was shown radiographically by a change of ulnar inclination of the radius from 33 degrees to 21 degrees, an increase in scaphoid height from 16.4 to 20.4 mm, and reversal of ulnar carpal translation as shown by an increase in lunate-covering ratio of 64% to 77%. Reduction of the ulnar inclination to normal values by corrective radial osteotomy restores a more physiologic range of motion, decreases symptomatic wrist pain, reverts adaptive carpal changes to normal, increases lunate coverage, and may prevent abnormal cartilage overload in the ulnar compartment of the wrist. Copyright (C) 2001 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available