4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Spectrum of pulmonary aspergillosis:: Histologic, clinical, and radiologic findings

Journal

RADIOGRAPHICS
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 825-837

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.21.4.g01jl03825

Keywords

aspergillosis; lung, cavitation; lung, consolidation; lung, CT; lung, infection; lung, necrosis; lung, nodule

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aspergillosis is a serious pathologic condition caused by Aspergillus organisms and is frequently seen in immuno compromised patients. At computed tomography (CT), saprophytic aspergillosis (aspergilloma) is characterized by a mass with soft-tissue attenuation within a lung cavity. The mass is typically separated from the cavity wall by an airspace (air crescent sign) and is often associated with thickening of the wall and adjacent pleura. CT findings in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis consist primarily of mucoid impaction and bronchiectasis involving predominantly the segmental and subsegmental bronchi of the upper lobes. Aspergillus necrotizing bronchitis may manifest as an endobronchial mass, obstructive pneumonitis or collapse, or a hilar mass. Bronchiolitis is characterized by centrilobular nodules and branching linear or nodular areas of increased attenuation (tree-in-bud pattern). Obstructing bronchopulmonary aspergillosis mimics allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis at CT and manifests as bilateral bronchial and bronchiolar dilatation, large mucoid impactions, and diffuse lower lobe consolidation caused by postobstructive atelectasis. Characteristic CT findings in angioinvasive aspergillosis consist of nodules surrounded by a halo of ground-glass attenuation (halo sign) or pleura-based, wedge-shaped areas of consolidation. Although imaging findings in pulmonary aspergillosis may be nonspecific, in the appropriate clinical setting, familiarity with the CT findings may suggest or even help establish the diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available