4.6 Article

TGFβ and EGF synergistically induce a more invasive phenotype of epithelial ovarian cancer cells

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.09.059

Keywords

Epithelial ovarian cancer; TGF beta; EGF; Epithelial-mesenchymal transition; Slug; Snail

Funding

  1. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry
  2. Women and Children's Health Research Institute of the University of Alberta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is associated with progression and metastasis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Snail and Slug (two members of the Snail family of transcription factors) down-regulate the expression of the adhesion molecule E-cadherin and thus function as positive regulators of EMT. Their expression is associated with a more invasive phenotype of EOC. However, how their expression in EOC cells is regulated needs to be further defined. Here, we show that transforming growth factor beta (TGF beta) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) synergistically induce the expression of Slug and Snail at both mRNA and protein levels in an EOC cell line OVCA429 cells. Using specific chemical inhibitors, we demonstrate that Slug and Snail expression induced by TGF beta is mediated by TGF beta/ALK5 pathway, and EGF-induced expression of Slug and Snail is MEK1/2-dependent. Interestingly, TGF beta-induced Slug expression is also MEK1/2-dependent. Further, we demonstrate that combined TGF beta and EGF stimulation is more potent than either alone in repressing the expression of E-cadherin. Functionally, combined stimulation of TGF beta and EGF enhances the mobility of OVCA429 cells and induces the production of MMP2 by OVCA429 cells more potently than either alone. Taken together, our data demonstrate that TGF beta and EGF signaling pathways synergistically induce EMT and render EOC cells a more invasive phenotype. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available