4.6 Article

Nifedipine, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits inflammatory and fibrogenic gene expressions in advanced glycation end product (AGE)-exposed fibroblasts via mineralocorticoid receptor antagonistic activity

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.149

Keywords

AGE; Inflammation; Nifedipine; Aldosterone; Mineralocorticoid receptor

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advanced glycation end products (AGE) are involved in tissue damage and remodeling. This study investigated whether AGE could elicit inflammatory and fibrogenic reactions in fibroblast cell line MRC-5 cells via autocrine production of aldosterone and if nifedipine could block the AGE actions through mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonistic activity. AGE significantly up-regulated monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), type III collagen and receptor for AGE (RAGE) mRNA levels in MRC-5 cells, all of which were completely blocked by nifedipine or an MR antagonist spironolactone. Aldosterone also dose-dependently increased MCP-1, TGF-beta and type III collagen mRNA levels in MRC-5 cells, which were suppressed by nifedipine, but not amlodipine, a control calcium channel blocker. Further, AGE significantly stimulated aldosterone generation in MRC-5 cells, which was partially blocked by nifedipine or spironolactone. In this study, we demonstrated for the first time that AGE could evoke inflammatory and fibrogenic reactions in MRC-5 cells via aldosterone production, which were blocked by the MR antagonistic activity of nifedipine. Our present study provides a unique beneficial aspect of nifedipine on tissue damage and remodeling; it could work as an anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrogenic agent against AGE via MR antagonistic activity. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available