4.2 Article

Transcranial Doppler pulsatility indices as a measure of diffuse small-vessel disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 229-235

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2001.tb00039.x

Keywords

transcranial Doppler; pulsatility indices; magnetic resonance imaging; small-vessel disease

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [K23 NS 02088-01, K24 NS K24 NS 02092-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose. Elevation in pulsatility indices (Pls) as measured by transcranial Doppler (TCD) have been postulated to reflect downstream increased vascular resistance caused by small-vessel ischemic disease. Methods. The authors retrospectively compared TCD Pls and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) manifestations of small-vessel disease in 55 consecutive patients who underwent TCD studies and brain MRI within 6 months of each other during a 2-year period. Results. Correlations between TCD middle cerebral artery Pls and MRI measures were as follows: periventricular hyperintensity (PVH) = 0.52 (P < .0001), deep white matter hyperintensity (DWMH) = = 0.54 (P < .0001), lacunar disease = 0.31 (P = .02), and combined PVH/DWMH/lacunes = 0.54 (P < .0001). Correlation between pontine ischemia and vertebrobasilar Pls was 0.46 (P = .0004). Univariate analysis showed that age, elevated PI, and hypertension strongly correlated with white matter disease measures. After adjusting for these factors in a multivariate Poisson regression analysis, PI remained an independent predictor of white matter disease. Receiver operator curve analyses identified PI cut points that allowed discrimination of PVH with 89% sensitivity and 86% specificity and discrimination of DWMH with 70% sensitivity and 73% specificity. Conclusions. Elevation in Pls as measured by TCD shows strong correlation with MRI evidence of small-vessel disease. TCD may be a useful physiologic index of the presence and severity of diffuse small-vessel disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available