4.0 Article

Factors associated with self-perceived state of health in adolescents with congenital cardiac disease attending paediatric cardiologic clinics

Journal

CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 431-438

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1047951101000555

Keywords

congenital heart disease; perceived health; rehabilitation; psychological factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of our study was to determine the ways in which adolescents with congenital cardiac disease believed that the condition had affected their life, and how these views were related to their perceived health. Interviews were conducted with a series of 37 adolescents, 17 girls and 20 boys, aged from 11 to 18, as they attended the clinics of 4 paediatric cardiologists in a teaching hospital in the United Kingdom. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed for recurring themes. A questionnaire was formed consisting of a set of questions for each theme, and additional items eliciting perceived health, and administered to a second series of 74 adolescents, 40 boys and 34 girls, who were again aged from 11 to is years. Slightly less than half (46%) perceived their health as either good or very good, and one-third (33%) rated it as average The majority (66%) felt themselves to be the same as, or only very slightly different from, their peers. The assessment: of the seriousness of their condition by the adolescents, the degree to which they saw themselves as different from others, and their perceived health, were not related to the complexity of the underlying medical condition as rated by their physician. It was the psychosocial themes, such as exclusion from activities or the effect of the condition on relationships, that were most strongly related to the perception of their health by the adolescents. Improved education of parents, teachers and peers, and attendance at classes for cardiac rehabilitation, might help to ameliorate some of these problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available