4.6 Article

Ellagic acid promotes Aβ42 fibrillization and inhibits Aβ42-induced neurotoxicity

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 390, Issue 4, Pages 1250-1254

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.10.130

Keywords

Ellagic acid; Alzheimer's disease; beta-Amyloid; Aggregation; Neurotoxicity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [30971012, 30570622]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, China [5072023]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2007AA02Z309]
  4. Dr. Shun Tak Wu's Medical Sciences Fund
  5. Tsinghua-Yue-Yuen Medical Sciences Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Smaller, soluble oligomers of beta-amyloid (A beta) play a critical role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Selective inhibition of A beta oligomer formation provides an optimum target for AD therapy. Some polyphenols have potent anti-amyloidogenic activities and protect against A beta neurotoxicity. Here, we tested the effects of ellagic acid (EA), a polyphenolic compound, on A beta 42 aggregation and neurotoxicity in vitro. EA promoted A beta fibril formation and significant oligomer loss, contrary to previous results that polyphenols inhibited A beta aggregation. The results of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Western blot displayed more fibrils in A beta 42 samples co-incubated with EA in earlier phases of aggregation. Consistent with the hypothesis that plaque formation may represent a protective mechanism in which the body sequesters toxic A beta aggregates to render them harmless, our MTT results showed that EA could significantly reduce A beta 42-induced neurotoxicity toward SH-SY5Y cells. Taken together, our results suggest that EA, an active ingredient in many fruits and nuts, may have therapeutic potential in AD. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available