4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: Modulated and unmodulated pulse trains

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages 368-379

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/1.1375140

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC002258, R01 DC002258-06, P01 DC000361-100005] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many modern cochlear implants use sound processing strategies that stimulate the cochlea with modulated pulse trains. Rubinstein et al. [Hear. Res. 127, 108 (1999)] suggested that representation of the modulator in auditory nerve responses might be improved by the addition of a sustained, high-rate, desynchronizing pulse train (DPT). In addition, activity in response to the DPT may mimic the spontaneous activity (SA) in a healthy ear. The goals of this study were to compare responses of auditory nerve fibers in acutely deafened, anesthetized cats elicited by high-rate electric pulse trains delivered through an intracochlear electrode with SA, and to measure responses of these fibers to amplitude-modulated pulse trains superimposed upon a DPT. Responses to pulse trains showed variability from presentation to presentation, but differed from SA in the shape of the envelope of the interval histogram (IH) for pulse rates above 4.8 kpps (kilo pulses per second). These IHs had a prominent mode near 5 ms that was followed by a long tail, Responses to modulated biphasic pulse trains resembled responses to tones in intact ears for small (< 10%) modulation depths, suggesting that acousticlike responses to sinusoidal stimuli might be obtained with a DPT. However, realistic responses were only observed over a narrow range of levels and modulation depths. Improved coding of complex stimulus waveforms may be achieved by signal processing strategies for cochlear implants that properly incorporate a DPT. (C) 2001 Acoustical Society of America.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available