4.7 Article

Body fatness and fat distribution as predictors of metabolic abnormalities and early carotid atherosclerosis

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1248-1252

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.7.1248

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - To test the hypothesis that intra-abdominal fat plays a primary role over general adiposity for metabolic abnormalities and atherosclerosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We cross-sectionally studied 849 Japanese men aged 50.3 +/- 8.5 years (range 20-78) with BMI 23.5 +/- 2.9 kg/m(2). Intimal-medial thickness (IMT) of the carotid artery was measured by ultrasound. General adiposity was assessed by BMI. Waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) were used as a surrogate measure for abdominal fat. Abdominal subcutaneous fat area (ASF) and intra-abdominal fat area (IAF) were measured by computed tomography. Correlations between these measures and carotid IMT were analyzed. The interaction of generalized adiposity (BMI) and IAF in relation to metabolic variables, such as glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, and serum lipids, was also evaluated. RESULTS - BMI, waist circumference, WHR, ASF, and IAF were all correlated with carotid IMT. Adjustment for BMI eliminated the associations between IMT and waist circumference. ASF, and IAF. In contrast, WHR retained a significant correlation with IMT. BMI and IAF were associated with insulin resistance, glucose tolerance, HDL cholesterol, and blood pressure independently of each other. IAF was an independent correlate for serum triglyceride, but BMI was not. CONCLUSIONS - The primary importance of IAF over general adiposity for carotid atherosclerosis was not confirmed. Caution is recommended when using WHR as a measure of abdominal fat. The roles of IAF for metabolic abnormalities may be more limited than conventionally thought. BMI and WHR are simple and better clinical predictors for carotid atherosclerosis versus IAF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available