4.7 Article

Influence of cropping systems on stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii), Meloidogyne arenaria, and the nematode antagonist Pasteuria penetrans in peanut

Journal

PLANT DISEASE
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages 767-772

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.7.767

Keywords

Arachis hypogaea; gall indices; Gossypium hirsutum; Paspalum notatum; root-knot nematode; suppressive soil; thrips; Zea mays

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of crop rotation (main plots) and pesticide treatment (subplots) on stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii), Meloidogyne arenaria, and the nematode antagonist Pasteuria penetrans was determined in a field experiment. The field site was naturally infested with all three organisms. Peanut (P) was rotated with 2 years of either cotton (Ct), corn (C), or bahiagrass (B). The pesticide treatments for the peanut crop were aldicarb (31 g a.i. per 100-m row), flutolanil (1.7 kg a.i./ha), aldicarb + flutolanil, and a control without either pesticide. Populations of M. arenaria were lower in peanut in the Ct-Ct-P than in P-P-P, C-C-P, or B-B-P plots and tended to be lower in plots treated with aldicarb. Abundance of P. penetrans endospores was highest in the P-P-P plots, intermediate in the B-B-P rotations, lowest in all other rotations, and was unaffected by aldicarb. The high endospore densities in the P-P-P plots may have contributed to the uncharacteristically low nematode populations in the monoculture. Incidence of stem rot in peanut was lowest in treatments with flutolanil, intermediate in the control, and highest in treatments with aldicarb alone. The greater canopy cover in aldicarb-treated plots may have created a conducive environment for S. rolfsii infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available