4.6 Article

Persistent organochlorine pesticides detected in blood and tissue samples of vultures from different localities in South Africa

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1532-0456(01)90201-7

Keywords

African whitebacked vulture; bioindicators; blood concentrations; chlorinated hydrocarbons; ecotoxicology; organochlorine pesticides; tissue samples; vulture species

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gaschromatography was used to establish the presence of quantifiable residues of 14 persistent chlorinated hydrocarbon pollutants in whole blood, clotted blood, heart, kidney, liver and muscle samples obtained from individual African whitebacked (Pseudogyps africanus), Cape griffon (Gyps coprotheres) and Lappetfaced (Torgos tracheliotos) vultures from different localities in South Africa. The levels of pesticides measured in whole blood samples of live specimens were compared between nestlings from two natural breeding colonies, adults from a wildlife area and birds held in captivity. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) differences between populations were detected in geometric means calculated for gamma -BHC (lindane), alpha (cis)-chlordane and alpha -endosulfan, Five of the organochlorine contaminants displayed significant variations between concentrations detected in the clotted blood, organs and muscles excised from vulture carcasses. This includes residues of gamma -BHC, alpha -chlordane, dieldrin, beta -endosulfan and heptachlor epoxide, Values of the respective biocides measured in vulture samples were generally low in comparison to results documented for a number of avian species. Although no threat is posed by any of the organochloride pesticides, continual monitoring of especially breeding colonies is recommended. Furthermore, the suitability of African whitebacked vulture nestlings as basic bioindicators is highly advocated. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available