4.6 Article

Distortion of the Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Binding Groove to Accommodate an Insulin-derived 10-Mer Peptide

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 290, Issue 31, Pages 18924-18933

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.622522

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust ISSF grant
  2. United Kingdom Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H001085/1]
  3. Medical Research Council [G0901155]
  4. Diabetes UK PhD studentship
  5. Research Councils United Kingdom fellowship
  6. BBSRC [BB/H001085/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. MRC [G0901155] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H001085/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [G0901155] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Wellcome Trust [100327/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Wellcome Trust [100327/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The non-obese diabetic mouse model of type 1 diabetes continues to be an important tool for delineating the role of T-cell mediated destruction of pancreatic beta-cells. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that enable this disease pathway. We show that insulin reactivity by a CD8(+) T-cell clone, known to induce type 1 diabetes, is characterized by weak T-cell antigen receptor binding to a relatively unstable peptide-MHC. The structure of the native 9- and 10-mer insulin epitopes demonstrated that peptide residues 7 and 8 form a prominent solvent-exposed bulge that could potentially be the main focus of T-cell receptor binding. The C terminus of the peptide governed peptide-MHC stability. Unexpectedly, we further demonstrate a novel mode of flexible peptide presentation in which the MHC peptide-binding groove is able to open the back door to accommodate extra C-terminal peptide residues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available