4.5 Review

Retinal microvascular abnormalities and their relationship with hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and mortality

Journal

SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 59-80

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6257(01)00234-X

Keywords

arteriosclerosis; arteriovenous nicking; atherosclerosis; cardiovascular disease; hypertension; ischemic heart disease; retinal arteriolar narrowing; retinal arteriovenous ratio; retinal microvascular abnormalities; retinal photographic grading; retinopathy; stroke

Categories

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY06594] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL59259] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Retinal microvascular abnormalities, such as generalized and focal arteriolar narrowing, arteriovenous nicking and retinopathy, reflect cumulative vascular damage from hypertension, aging, and other processes. Epidemiological studies indicate that these abnormalities can be observed in 2-5% of the nondiabetic general population and are strongly and consistently associated with elevated blood pressure. Generalized arteriolar narrowing and arteriovenous nicking also appear to be irreversible long-term markers of hypertension, related not only to current but past blood pressure levels as well. There are data supporting an association between retinal microvascular abnormalities and stroke, but there is no convincing evidence of an independent or direct association with atherosclerosis, ischemic heart disease, or cardiovascular mortality. New computer-related imaging methods are currently being developed to detect the presence and severity of retinal arteriolar narrowing and other microvascular characteristics. When reliably quantified, retinal microvascular abnormalities may be useful as risk indicators for cerebrovascular diseases. (Surv Ophthalmol 46:59-80, 2001. (C) 2001 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available