4.5 Article

Competitive and noncompetitive NMDA antagonist effects in rats trained to discriminate lever-press counts

Journal

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 69, Issue 3-4, Pages 493-502

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00568-8

Keywords

fixed consecutive number; complex discrimination; counting behavior; working memory; NMDA receptor; competitive antagonist; noncompetitive antagonist; rat

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The glutamate activated N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor may play a role in short-term memory processing. Among the evidence for this is that NMDA antagonists can impair accuracy in fixed consecutive number (FCN) tasks. This study was designed to further characterize this effect by examining NMDA antagonists differing in their cellular mechanisms of action. Rats were trained to respond under an FCN operant schedule, which required eight presses on one lever (counting lever) before one press at an alternate lever (reinforcement lever) would produce food reinforcement. The effects of three noncompetitive [MK-801 (0.01-0.56 mg/kg); phencyclidine (0.3-3.0 mg/kg); memantine (1-10 mg/kg)] and two competitive [SDZ EAA 494 (0.3-3.0 mg/kg) and NPC 17742 (2.0-16 mg/kg)] NMDA antagonists were analyzed. MK-801 and phencyclidine decreased accuracy at doses not reducing response rates. Memantine, and both of the competitive antagonists, also reduced accuracy, but did so only at doses that markedly reduced response rates. These results suggest that both the affinity and the site bound on the NMDA glutamate receptor by antagonists can determine their effects on FCN performance. Subsequent studies investigated whether SCH 23390, a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, and NMDA could modulate the effects by phencyclidine and SDZ EAA 494, respectively, on FCN performance. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available