4.6 Article

Hypoperfusion without ischemia surrounding acute intracerebral hemorrhage

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 804-810

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004647-200107000-00005

Keywords

CBF; CMRO2; intracerebral hemorrhage; ischemia; oxygen extraction fraction; positron emission tomography

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS35966] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A zone of hypoperfusion surrounding acute intracerebral hemorrhage OCH) has been interpreted as regional ischemia. To determine if ischemia is present in the periclot area, the authors measured cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2), and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) with positron emission tomography (PET) in 19 patients 5 to 22 hours after hemorrhage onset. Periclot CBF, CMRO2, and OEF were determined in a 1-cm-wide area around the do; in the 16 patients without midline shift, periclot data were compared with mirror contralateral regions. All PET images were masked to exclude noncerebral structures, and all PET measurements were corrected for partial volume effect due to dot and ventricles. Both periclot CBF and CMRO2 were significantly reduced compared with contralateral values (CBF: 20.9 +/- 7.6 vs. 37.0 +/- 13.9 ml 100 g(-1) min(-1). P = 0.0004 CMRO2: 1.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.9 mL 100 g(-1) min(-1), P = 0.00001). Periclot OEF was less than both hemispheric OEF (0.42 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.47 +/- 0.13, P = 0.05; n = 19) and contralateral regional OEF (0.44 +/- 0.16 vs. 0.51 +/- 0.13, P = 0.05; n = 16). In conclusion, CMRO, was reduced to a greater degree than CBF in the periclot region in acute ICH, resulting in reduced OEF rather than the increased OEF that occurs in ischemia. Thus, the authors found no evidence for ischemia in the periclot zone of hypoperfusion in acute TCH patients studied 5 to 22 hours after hemorrhage onset.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available