4.3 Article

Reproductive physiology of Aedes (Aedimorphus) vexans (Diptera: Culicidae) in relation to flight potential

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 557-565

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585-38.4.557

Keywords

Aedes vexans; physiology; flight; size; reproductive potential; reserves

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Total protein, lipid, and glycogen of Aedes vexans (Meigen) were related linearly to body size at eclosion. Starvation after emergence led to the determination of minimal irreducible amounts of protein, lipid, and glycogen and the availability of the teneral reserves, whereas access to sucrose revealed the potential for reserve synthesis. Glycogenesis and lipogenesis increased reserves approximate to 10-fold the teneral value within 1 and 2 wk after emergence, respectively. Carbohydrate feeding was an essential behavior before blood feeding and oogenesis commenced. Female night was tested on a flight mill. Maximal flights of 10-17 km in a single night occurred at 2 wk posteclosion and paralleled maximal reserve syntheses. Comparisons of our laboratory data to host-seeking mosquitoes in the field confirmed our data. The vast majority of maternal lipid was transfer red to the yolk when a blood. meal was taken, but only a quarter of the blood protein was recovered fi om mature ovaries. Maternal glycogen was used mainly for flight. Fecundity varied between 20 and 120 eggs per female and was determined largely by body size and blood meal volume. At 27 degreesC, maximal egg numbers were produced, but at 22 and 17 degreesC the caloric yolk content was greater. Females from the southern United. States were smaller than females from northern areas. However, southern females had similar fecundity as northern females, and their flight performances were similar. Differences in the reproductive physiology between this species and Ac, aegypti were discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available