4.3 Article

The validity of adding new tasks to the assessment of motor and process skills

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages 409-415

Publisher

AMER OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSOC, INC
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.55.4.409

Keywords

activities of daily living evaluation; evaluation process, occupational therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG 12345] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Twenty-one new activities of daily living (ADL) tasks were evaluated for the validity of their inclusion into the Assessment of Motor and Process SX ills (AMPS). Method. Data from 1,484 participants who performed at least one new AMPS task were analyzed to determine whether the new tasks (a) Jit the AMPS many-faceted Rasch (MFR) model and (b) increase the range of the AMPS motor and process skill scales. Results. Twenty of the 21 new tasks fit the MFR model. The AMPS motor scale was increased by .25 logit at the easier end of the scale and by .30 logit at the more difficult end of the scale. The AMPS process scale was increased by .14 logit at the easier end of the scale. The more difficult end of the AMPS process scale did nor increase. Conclusion. These findings support the validity of adding 20 new tasks into the AMPS. The new tasks provide the following benefits for testing clients whose ADL ability levels are at the lower or higher ends of the AMPS motor or process skill scales: (a) potential for less error when estimating the ADL ability measures, (b) more tasks choices, and (c) more face-valid tasks for testing men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available