4.3 Article

Depressive symptoms, menopausal status, and climacteric symptoms in women at midlife

Journal

PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages 603-608

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00006842-200107000-00013

Keywords

menopause; depression; climacteric symptoms

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [5U19-CA72099] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Previous studies have found increased rates of depression in women aged 45 to 54 years, but the factors that influence these rates are not understood. It was assessed whether higher rates of depressive symptoms were associated with menopausal status, climacteric symptoms, and use of hormone replacement therapy. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Community sample. Methods: Data are from 581 women ages 45 to 54 years who were interviewed by telephone between October 1998 and February 1999. Measures: Depression was measured with the abbreviated CES-D, a depressive symptoms screening measure. Women's reported perception of menopausal stage, frequency of periods in the preceding 12 months, and history of oophorectomy were used to classify their menopausal status into four categories: (1) no indication of menopause; (2) close to menopause; (3) had begun menopause; and (4) had completed menopause. Results: There were 168 women (28.9%) who reported a high level (greater than or equal to 10) of depressive symptoms when the abbreviated CES-D was used. In a logistic-regression analysis, significant factors associated with increased depressive symptoms included physical inactivity, inadequate income, use of estrogen/progesterone combination, and presence of climacteric symptoms (trouble sleeping, mood swings, or memory problems). Menopausal status was not associated with depressive symptoms. Conclusions: In this sample of women age 45 to 54 years, climacteric symptoms but not menopausal status were associated with higher rates of depressive symptoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available