4.8 Article

Conversion and temperature profiles during the photoinitiated polymerization of thick orthopaedic biomaterials

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 22, Issue 13, Pages 1779-1786

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00347-1

Keywords

photopolymerization; polyanhydrides; orthopaedic biomaterials; temperature profile; multifunctional monomers

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR44375-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polymerization of a tetrafunctional monomer was investigated under a variety of photoinitiation conditions to assess the ability to form thick materials in situ for orthopaedic applications. The major biological concerns include local cell and tissue necrosis due to the polymerization exotherm and low conversions at greater depths due to light attenuation through thick samples. Experimental results indicate that depth of cure and temperature rises are controllable by altering the photoinitiator concentration, initiating light intensity, and type of photoinitiator. For example, no measurable conversion was detected at a 1.0 cm depth when polymerization was initiated with 1.0wt% DMPA and 100mW/cm(2) ultraviolet light, whereas similar to 40% conversion was obtained when the initiator concentration was lowered to 0.1 wt%. This conversion was further increased to similar to 55% when a photobleaching initiator system was employed. At the highest rate of initiation studied (i.e., 1.0 wt% DMPA irradiated with 100 mW/cm(2) ultraviolet light), a maximum temperature of similar to 49 degreesC was reached at the sample surface; however, this temperature dramatically decreased to similar to 33 degreesC when the light intensity was decreased to 25 mW/cm(2). Finally, dual initiating systems that synergistically combine the advantages of photoinitiation and thermal initiation were investigated. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available