4.7 Article

Expression of R120G-αB-crystallin causes aberrant desmin and αB-crystallin aggregation and cardiomyopathy in mice

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages 84-91

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hh1301.092688

Keywords

transgenic; heart disease; mouse; cardiac; genetics

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL62459, HL52318, HL41496, HL56370, HL60546, HL56620] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Upregulation of alphaB-crystallin (CryAB), a small heat shock protein, is associated with a variety of diseases, including the desmin-related myopathies. CryAB, which binds to both desmin and cytoplasmic actin, may participate as a chaperone in intermediate filament formation and maintenance, but the physiological consequences of CryAB upregulation are unknown. A mutation in CryAB, R120G, has been linked to a familiar desminopathy. However, it is unclear whether the mutation is directly causative. We created multiple transgenic mouse lines that overexpressed either murine wild-type CryAB or the R120G mutation in cardiomyocytes. Overexpression of wild-type CryAB was relatively benign, with no increases in mortality and no induction of desmin-related cardiomyopathy even in a line in which CryAB mRNA expression was increased approximate to 104-fold and the protein level increased by Ii-fold. In contrast, Lines expressing the R120G mutation were compromised, with a high-expressing line exhibiting 100% mortality by early adulthood. Modest expression levels resulted in a phenotype that was strikingly similar to that observed for the desmin-related cardiomyopathies. The desmin filaments in the cardiomyocytes were overtly affected, myofibril alignment was significantly impaired, and a hypertrophic response occurred at both the molecular and cellular levels. The data show that the R120G mutation causes a desminopathy, is dominant negative, and results in cardiac hypertrophy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available