4.1 Article

Systematic evaluation of the dihydrogen-oxidising and NAD+-reducing soluble [NiFe]-hydrogenase from Ralstonia eutropha H16 as a cofactor regeneration catalyst

Journal

BIOCATALYSIS AND BIOTRANSFORMATION
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 246-252

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/10242422.2011.615393

Keywords

Bidirectional [NiFe]-hydrogenase; Ralstonia eutropha H16; H-2-oxidising activity; enzyme stability; cofactor regeneration; hydrogen conversion

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [EXC 314]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The oxygen-tolerant NAD(+)-reducing soluble hydrogenase (SH) from Ralstonia eutropha H16 has been described as a promising catalyst for cofactor regeneration in biocatalysed reductions. In this study, the actual potential of this enzyme for application in technical synthesis was evaluated. An overproduced, purified version of the enzyme was coupled to the carbonyl reductase from Candida parapsilosis (CPCR), where it allowed an almost quantitative conversion of the model substrate; total turnover numbers (TTN: n(product)/n(enzyme)) of up to 143,666 were achieved. This was distinctly superior to the commonly used NADH regenerating enzyme formate dehydrogenase (FDH) from Candida boidinii. In a systematic quantitative approach, maximum activity for NAD(+) reduction was observed at 35 degrees C and pH 8, which corresponds to that of native SH. The half-life of the enzyme under these conditions was 5.3 hours. In the presence of sodium salts, distinct inhibitory effects were observed while ammonium and potassium ions increased the enzyme stability. Overall, a high but not unusual sensitivity of SH for changes in temperature, pH and mechanical stress in a reactor was found. Technical application in chemical synthesis can therefore be considered a feasible goal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available