4.8 Article

In vivo downregulation of T helper cell 1 immune responses reduces atherogenesis in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages 197-202

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.104.2.197

Keywords

atherosclerosis; lymphocytes; inflammation; interleukins; inhibitors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-A chronic immune response involving proinflammatory T helper cell 1 (Th1) lymphocyte activation occurs in the atherosclerotic lesion, but whether this activation is protective or deleterious remains unclear. Methods and Results-We modulated the immune response of the atherosclerosis-prone apolipoprotein E-deficient (apoE(-/-)) mouse. Eight-week-old apoE-/- mice were treated daily with pentosifylline (PTX), a known inhibitor of the Th1 differentiation pathway, or PBS (control) for 4 weeks or 12 weeks. Twelve-week PTX treatment reduced atherosclerotic lesion size by 60% (P <0.01). PTX-treated mice developed lesions that were limited to the degree of fatty streaks. In contrast, control mice developed mature fibrofatty atherosclerotic lesions. In parallel, the proportion of interferon (IFN)-gamma -producing Th1 splenic lymphocytes was significantly reduced by PTX, and lesion size was correlated to the proportion of IFN-gamma (+) T cells. In vitro addition of PTX to cultured spleen cells did not modify the production of IFN-gamma but increased the production of IL-10 by T cells, indicating that PTX does not suppress IFN-gamma production but rather blocks Th1 polarization while promoting Th2 polarization. Conclusions-Thus, PTX protected mice from atherosclerosis by reducing the Th1 polarization of T helper lymphocytes. This study demonstrates that the Th1 immune response associated with atherosclerosis is deleterious and that a modulation of the Th1 differentiation pathway may provide a new pharmacological tool to treat this disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available