4.6 Article

Identification of active site residues in glucosylceramide synthase -: A nucleotide-binding/catalytic motif conserved with processive β-glycosyltransferases

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 276, Issue 28, Pages 26492-26498

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M102612200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM22942] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glucosylceramide synthase (GCS) transfers glucose from UDP-Glc to ceramide, catalyzing the first glycosylation step in the formation of higher order glycosphingolipids, The amino acid sequence of GCS was reported to be dissimilar from other proteins, with no identifiable functional domains. We previously identified His-193 of rat GCS as an important residue in UDP-Glc and GCS inhibitor binding; however, little else is known about the GCS active site. Here, we identify key residues of the GCS active site by performing biochemical and site-directed mutagenesis studies of rat GCS expressed in bacteria. First, we found that Cys-207 was the primary residue involved in GCS N-ethylmaleimide sensitivity. Next, we showed by multiple alignment that the region of GCS flanking His-193 and Cys-SO? (amino acids 89-278) contains a D1,D2,D3,(Q/R)XXRW motif found in the putative active site of processive beta -glycosyltransferases (e,g, cellulose, chitin, and hyaluronan syntheses). Site-directed mutagenesis studies demonstrated that most of the highly conserved residues were essential for GCS activity. We also note that GCS and processive beta -glycosyltransferases are topologically similar, possessing cytosolic active sites, with putative transmembrane domains immediately N-terminal to the conserved domain. These results provide the first extensive information on the GCS active site and show that GCS and processive beta -glycosyltransferases possess a conserved substrate-binding/catalytic domain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available