4.6 Article

A prospective trial of inhaled nitric oxide in clinical lung transplantation

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages 112-115

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200107150-00022

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Reperfusion injury (RI) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity among lung transplant recipients. We sought to determine if prophylactic administration of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) to lung transplant recipients at reperfusion would prevent RI. We also hypothesized that if prophylactic NO proves ineffective in preventing RI then it may improve pulmonary hemodynamics and gas exchange in the subset of patients who develop RI. Methods. After informed consent, 28 consecutive, adult lung transplant recipients received NO at 20 ppm at reperfusion. NO was withdrawn for 15 min at 6 and 12 hr after reperfusion, and gas exchange and hemodynamics were measured. Results. Five of the 28 lung transplant recipients (18%) developed RI. Withdrawal of NO for 15 min in this subset of patients resulted in a significant rise in mean pulmonary artery pressure and a reduction in oxygenation index. All five patients with RI were kept on inhaled NO until full functional recovery of the allograft and were then weaned from mechanical ventilation. None required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support; the early mortality in this group was 20% (1/5), The remaining 23 patients without RI had uneventful early postoperative course and were weaned from NO and mechanical ventilation within 36 hr of transplantation. Conclusions. Prophylactic-inhaled NO does not prevent RI in human lung transplantation. However, inhaled NO, started at reperfusion, improves gas exchange and reduces pulmonary artery pressure in those patients who develop RI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available