4.5 Article

Long-range transport of 'giant' aeolian quartz grains: linkage with discrete sedimentary sources and implications for protective particle transfer

Journal

MARINE GEOLOGY
Volume 177, Issue 3-4, Pages 411-417

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0025-3227(01)00171-2

Keywords

dust; atmospheric transport; SEM data; Sahara; Asia; ice-rafting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several articles have documented the presence of large particles (> 62.5 mum) that have been transported great distances (> 1000 km) through the atmosphere. At present, we do not understand the mechanisms that lead to mineral grains being carried aloft far beyond the limits imposed by conventional gravitational settling models. Typically, marine geologists refer to ice rafting and/or advective transport by ocean currents as the dominant transport processes that deliver large mineral grains to deep sea sediments. Textural analyses of 'giant' quartz grains from six sedimentary deposition events collected from various sources, including a single site in the North Pacific Ocean and sites in the British Isles and France, strongly support the idea that in each case all of the grains were initially eroded from a discrete sediment type, and often a discrete point source, and subsequently transported via the atmosphere to our sampling sites up to 10 000 km away. These findings suggest that at least at times erosional events fuelling long distance atmospheric transport are exceedingly specific and operate upon geologically distinctive assemblages; and are able to effect long distance transfer of large grains with no grain-to-grain collisions. This work also suggests that atmospheric transport should be included as a possible means of delivery for significant quantities of 'giant' sedimentary particles to remote marine sites such as the Lord Howe Rise. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available