4.7 Article

Susceptibility to neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia and the T102C polymorphism in the serotonin type 2A receptor

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 144-147

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01076-9

Keywords

serotonin receptor gene; polymorphism; schizophrenia; tardive dyskinesia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Genetic factors have been implicated in the pathophysiology of the movement disorder tardive dyskinesia, which may involve dopamine-serotonin interaction. Case-control association studies have identified the T102C polymorphism of the 5-HT2A receptor gene as being associated with schizophrenia and responsiveness to clozapine. In this study, we examine the association of this polymorphism in the 5-HT2A receptor gene as a risk factor for developing schizophrenia and tardive dyskinesia from prolonged treatment with neuroleptics. Methods: Ninety-seven healthy control subjects with no history of mental illness and 221 schizophrenic patients (87 with tardive dyskinesia, 134 without) were genotyped by PCR-RFLP. Results: Comparison between cases and control subjects revealed no significant association between the C allele and schizophrenia. There was significant difference in allele frequency (p = .044, OR = 1.54 95% CI = 1.02-2.33) between patients who developed tardive dyskinesia and those who did not. Significant difference remains even after adjusting for age and neuroleptic dosage (p = .041) with the odds ratio at 1.64 (95% CI 1.02-2.62). Conclusions: A genetic variant of the 5-HT2A receptor may be associated with neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia in schizophrenia. Further studies are needed to replicate the finding. The role of 5-HT2A receptor in the etiology of tardive dyskinesia or treatment-resistant schizophrenia should be further investigated. (C) 2001 Society of Biological Psychiatry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available