4.7 Article

Power-spectrum normalization from the local abundance of rich clusters of galaxies

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04306.x

Keywords

galaxies : clusters : general; cosmology : theory; large-scale structure of Universe; X-rays : galaxies : clusters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The number density of rich galaxy clusters still provides the most robust way of normalizing the power spectrum of dark matter perturbations on scales relevant to large-scale structure. We revisit this constraint in the light of several recent developments: (1) the availability of well-defined samples of local clusters with relatively accurate X-ray temperatures; (2) new theoretical mass functions for dark matter haloes, which provide a good fit to large numerical simulations; (3) more accurate mass-temperature relations from larger catalogues of hydrodynamical simulations; (4) the requirement to consider closed as well as open and flat cosmologies to obtain full multiparameter likelihood constraints for CMB and SNe studies. We present a new sample of clusters drawn from the literature and use this sample to obtain improved results on sigma (8), the normalization of the matter power spectrum on scales of 8 h(-1) Mpc, as a function of the matter density and cosmological constant in a universe with general curvature. We discuss our differences with previous work, and the remaining major sources of uncertainty. Final results on the normalization, approximately independent of power spectrum shape, can be expressed as constraints on cr at an appropriate cluster normalization scale R-Cl. We provide fitting formulas for R-Cl and sigma (R-Cl) for general cosmologies, as well as for sigma (8) as a function of cosmology and shape parameter Gamma. For flat models we find approximately sigma (8) similar or equal to (0.495 (+0.034)(-0.037)) Omega (-0.60)(M) for Gamma = 0.23, where the error bar is dominated by uncertainty in the mass-temperature relation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available