4.7 Article

Prevalence and predictors of early seizure and status epilepticus after first stroke

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 200-206

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.57.2.200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01-NS-29993, T32-NS-07153] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Early seizure (ES) has been reported in 2% to 6% of strokes and is a predictor of recurrent seizures. Acute stroke has been reported to cause 22% of all cases of status epilepticus in adults. The determinants of ES and status epilepticus (SE) after stroke, however, are not well understood. Methods: An incidence study was conducted to identify all cases of first stroke in adult residents of northern Manhattan. Cases of ES and SE within 7 days of stroke were identified through medical record review. Statistical analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: The cohort consisted of 904 patients; ES occurred in 37 (4.1%). The frequency of ES by stroke subtype and location was deep infarct 0.6% (2/356), lobar infarct 5.9% (20/341), deep intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) 4.0% (4/101), lobar ICH 14.3% (7/49), and subarachnoid hemorrhage 8.0% (4/50). SE occurred in 10 patients (1.1%), representing 27.0% of patients with ES. Diabetes, hypertension, current smoking, alcohol use, age, gender, and race/ethnicity were not significant determinants of ES. In a subgroup of patients who had an NIH strobe scale (NIHSS) score recorded, NIHSS score was not an independent predictor of ES in multivariate analysis. After accounting for stroke severity, ES was not a predictor of 30-day case fatality. Conclusions: Lesion location and stroke subtype are strong determinants of ES risk, even after adjusting for stroke severity. ES does not predict 30-day mortality. SE occurs in more than one-quarter of patients with ES.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available