4.6 Article

A proteasome inhibitor effectively prevents mouse heart allograft rejection

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 196-202

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200107270-00005

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. We have previously demonstrated in vitro that proteasome inhibitors could suppress proliferation and induce apoptosis of activated T cells. This finding suggests that such inhibitors could be used as a novel category of immunosuppressants in blocking allograft rejection. Methods. The proteasome inhibitor dipeptide boronic. acid (DPBA) was tested in vitro for its inhibitory effect on mouse T-cell proliferation and lymphokine secretion. DPBA was also used in vivo to treat mouse heterotopic heart allograft rejection. Possible side effects of this compound were examined according to blood chemistry of mice treated with DPBA. Results, DPBA suppressed the T-cell proliferation and potently inhibited interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, and IFN-gamma produced by anti-CD3-activated T cells. Given i.p. starting I day after transplantation at 0.66 mg/kg per day for 16 days, or at I mg(kg per day for 4 days followed by 0.5 mg/kg per day for 12 days, DPBA could prolong heart allograft survival to 35.5 days (mean survival time, MST) and to 36.2 days, respectively. The control group had MST of 7.3 days. When administrated 72 hr post operation at I mg/kg per day for 4 days, DPBA could prolong the graft survival to 19.8 days. During the course of these effective dosages, DPBA had no apparent toxicity in the liver, kidney, pancreas, or heart, according to analysis of blood chemistry. Conclusions. The proteasome inhibitor could repress allograft rejection in mice without apparent side-effects at the effective dosages. This finding has opened a new dimension in development of novel immunosuppressants for organ transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available