4.7 Article

Addition of synthetic and natural antioxidants to α-tocopheryl acetate supplemented beef patties:: effects of antioxidants and packaging on lipid oxidation

Journal

MEAT SCIENCE
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages 337-341

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00149-2

Keywords

antioxidants; packaging; oxidation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Friesian steers (n = 5), aged 26-27 months, were fed a diet containing 2000 (supplemented) IU alpha -tocopheryl acetate/head/day for approximately 50 days prior to slaughter. Muscularis semimembranosus muscles from supplemented cattle were held in frozen storage (-20 degrees Cx12 weeks) following which they were minced and divided into five batches. The batches contained: (1) control, containing only vitamin E supplemented beef(C); (2) vitamin E supplemented beef with 4% soya oil (S); (3) vitamin E supplemented beef mixed with 0.2% Duralox NMC dissolved in 4% soya oil (R1); (4) vitamin E supplemented beef mixed with 0.25% Herbalox type 25 (containing 25 natural antioxidant extracts of rosemary) dissolved in 4% soya oil (R2); and (5) vitamin E supplemented beef mixed with a 1:I mixture of 0.01% (w/w) BHA and 0.01% (w/w) BHT dissolved in 4% soya oil (B). The meat was then aerobically packaged (A) or packaged under the following modified atmospheres (MAP); 30:70 (M-1); 70:30 (M-2) or 80:20 (M-3) (O-2:CO2) Oxidative stability (TBARS) and Hunter 'a' values (redness) were determined in all beef patties over 8 days of refrigerated (4 degreesC) storage. Under MAP or aerobic packaging conditions, elevated oxygen levels brought about increased (P < 0.05) TEARS numbers during refrigerated storage. However, the addition of rosemary extracts or BHA/BHT significantly (P < 0.05) improved the oxidative stability of dietary a-tocopheryl acetate supplemented beef. Rosemary extracts were as effective in reducing TEARS as the combination of synthetic antioxidants, BHA/BHT. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available