4.7 Article

Dependence of halo properties on interaction history, environment, and cosmology

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 557, Issue 2, Pages 616-625

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/321631

Keywords

cosmology : theory; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; galaxies : halos; methods : n-body simulations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

I present results from numerical N-body simulations regarding the effect of merging events on the angular momentum distribution of galactic halos, as wen as a comparison of halo growth in Press-Schechter versus N-body methods. A total of six simulations are used, spanning three cosmologies: a standard flat Omega (0) = 1 model, an open Omega (0) = 0.3 model, and a tilted flat Omega (0) = 1 model with spectral index n = 0.8. In each model, one run was conducted using a spatially uniform grid of particles and one using a refined grid in a large void. In all three models and all environments tested, the mean angular momentum of merger remnants (halo interaction products with mass ratios 3:1 or less) is greater than nonmerger remnants. Furthermore, the dispersion in the merger-remnant angular momentum distribution is smaller than the dispersion of the nonmerger distribution. The interpretation most consistent with the data is that the orbital angular momentum of the interactors is important in establishing the final angular momentum of the merger product. I give the angular momentum distribution, which describes the merger remnant population. I trace the, most massive progenitor of L-* galactic-mass halos (uniform grid) and 10(11) Me halos (refined void) from z = 0 back to z = 5. Monte Carlo mass histories match simulations reasonably well for the latter sampled I find that for halos of mass 10(12) less than or similar to M less than or similar to 10(14) M-circle dot, this method can underestimate the mass of progenitors by 20%, hence yielding improper formation redshifts of halos. With this caveat, however, the general shapes of halo mass histories and formation time distributions are preserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available