4.4 Article

Developing a minimum standard of care for treating people with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee

Journal

BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 121-145

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.10.002

Keywords

osteoarthritis knee; osteoarthritis hip; clinical practice guidelines; model of care; evidence-based practice; clinical indicators

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We reviewed three recently published guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis (OA) and considered the evidence and potential for implementation. From this we propose a minimum standard of care, or a 'core set' of interventions that should be, offered to all patients with OA of the hip and/or knee. Eight core recommendations emerged where it is recommended that health-care professionals: Provide advice about, and offer access to appropriate information for OA self-management and lifestyle change Provide advice about weight loss if patient is overweight or obese and refer to services as required Provide advice for land-based exercises incorporating aerobic and strengthening components and refer to services as required Recommend adequate paracetamol for pain relief Make patients aware that non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or coxibs can improve symptoms in majority but this comes with potential for harm and that risk potential varies - be aware of and minimise the individual's risk potential Offer intra-articular steroids for short-term relief of a flare or acute deterioration in symptoms. Offer stronger analgesic relief if prolonged severe symptoms Offer access to assessment for arthroplasty for consumers with severe symptomatic CIA not responding to conservative therapy An integrated, chronic disease model of care is proposed to best implement OA management and a check list of clinical indicators/performance measures is provided. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available