4.7 Article

Monoterpene emissions from soil in a Sitka spruce forest

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 35, Issue 24, Pages 4081-4087

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00213-8

Keywords

Picea sitchensis; needle litter; soil emissions; temperature dependence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A dynamic soil enclosure was used to characterise monoterpene emissions from 3 soil depths within a Picea sitchensis (Sitka spruce) forest. In addition, a dynamic branch enclosure was used to provide comparative emissions data from foliage. In all cases, limonene and alpha -pinene dominated monoterpene soil emissions, whilst camphene, beta -pinene and myrcene were also present in significant quantities. alpha -Phellandrene, 3-carene and alpha -terpinene were occasionally emitted in quantifiable amounts whilst cymene and cineole, although tentatively identified, were always non-quantifiable. Total daily mean monoterpene emission rates, normalised to 30 degreesC, varied considerably between soil depths from 33.6 mug m(-2) h(-1) (range 28.3-38.4) for undisturbed soil, to 13.0 mug m(-2) h(-1) (8.97-16.4) with uppermost layer removed, to 199 mug m(-2) h(-1) (157-216) with partially decayed layer removed, suggesting that the surface needle litter was the most likely source of soil emissions to the atmosphere. Relative monoterpene ratios did not vary significantly between layers. Foliar monoterpenes exhibited a similar emission profile to soils with the exceptions of camphene and 3-carene whose contributions decreased and increased, respectively. Emission rates from foliage, normalised to 30 degreesC were found to have a daily mean of 625 ng g(-1) dw h(-1) (299-1360). Oil a land area basis however, total soil emissions were demonstrated to be relatively insignificant to total emissions from the forest ecosystem. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available