4.5 Article

Temporising versus interventionist management (preterm and at term)

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.01.004

Keywords

pre-eclampsia; HELLP-syndrome; temporising managament; management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pre-eclampsia has a strong association with adverse outcomes: high incidences at term, and low incidences of morbidity: low incidences remote from term, high incidences of morbidity. The ultimate cure for pre-eclampsia is delivery of the placenta, but gestational age at delivery has an effect on perinatal outcome. We review aspects of two contrasting management approaches, and their indication areas are described (i.e. a more interventionist approach of stabilization (with antihypertensive drugs if needed and corticosteroids for acceleration of fetal lung maturation) and delivery, compared with a more temporizing approach, that treats the symptoms until delivery is necessary. In general, the temporizing approach has been shown to be safe, but beyond 37 weeks gestational age, there is evidence for better outcomes after early delivery. Below that gestational age, trials are awaited that help determine the balance in individual cases, depending on severity of maternal disease and fetal condition. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available