4.6 Article

Wound healing in MIP-1α-/- and MCP-1-/- mice

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 159, Issue 2, Pages 457-463

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61717-8

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 44861-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG 16067] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 55238, R01 GM050875, R01 GM055238, GM 55344, GM 50875] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A salient feature of normal wound healing is the development and resolution of an acute inflammatory response. Although much is known about the function of inflammatory cells within wounds, little is known about the chemotactic and activation signals that influence this response. As the CC chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MEP-1 alpha) and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) are abundant in acute wounds, wound repair was examined in MIP-1 alpha (-/-) and MCP-1(-/-) mice. Surprisingly, wound re-epithelialization, angiogenesis, and collagen synthesis in MIP-1 alpha (-/-) mice was nearly identical to wildtype controls. In contrast, MCP-1(-/-) mice displayed significantly delayed wound re-epithelialization, with the greatest delay at day 3 after injury (28 +/- 5% versus 79 +/- 14% re-epithelialization, P < 0.005). Wound angiogenesis was also delayed in MCP-1(-/-) mice, with a 48% reduction in capillary density at day 5 after injury. Collagen synthesis was impeded as well, with the wounds of MCP-1(-/-) mice containing significantly less hydroxyproline than those of control mice (25 3 versus 50 +/- 8 mug/wound at day 5, P < 0.0001). No change in the number of wound macrophages was observed in MCP-1(-/-) mice, suggesting that monocyte recruitment into wounds is independent of this chemokine. The data suggest that MCP-1 plays a critical role in healing wounds, most likely by influencing the effector state of macrophages and other cell types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available