Journal
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages 1030-1038Publisher
ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/1.1383295
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Detection thresholds were measured for a sinusoidal modulation applied to the modulation depth of a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) white noise carrier as a function of the frequency of the modulation applied to the modulation depth (referred to as f(m)'). The SAM noise acted therefore as a carrier stimulus of frequency f(m), and sinusoidal modulation of the SAM-noise modulation depth generated two additional components in the modulation spectrum: f(m) -f(m)' and f(m) + f(m)'. The tracking variable was the modulation depth of the sinusoidal variation applied to the carrier modulation depth. The resulting second-order temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) measured on four listeners for carrier modulation frequencies f(m) of 16, 64, and 256 Hz display a low-pass segment followed by a plateau. This indicates that sensitivity to fluctuations in the strength of amplitude modulation is best for fluctuation rates f(m)' below about 2-4 Hz when using broadband noise carriers. Measurements of masked modulation detection thresholds for the lower and upper modulation sideband suggest that this capacity is possibly related to the detection of a beat in the sound's temporal envelope. The results appear qualitatively consistent with the predictions of an envelope detector model consisting of a low-pass filtering stage followed by a decision stage. Unlike listeners' performance, a modulation filterbank model using Q values greater than or equal to2 should predict that second-order modulation detection thresholds should decrease at high values of f(m)' due to the spectral resolution of the modulation sidebands (in the modulation domain). This suggests that, if such modulation filters do exist, their selectivity is poor. In the latter case, the Q value of modulation filters would have to be less than 2. This estimate of modulation filter selectivity is consistent with the results of a previous study using a modulation-masking paradigm [S. D. Ewert and T. Dau, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1181-1196 (2000)]. (C) 2001 Acoustical Society of America.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available