4.0 Article

Cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants in the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation

Journal

BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 225-237

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2013.07.012

Keywords

apixaban; dabigatran; rivaroxaban; warfarin; atrial fibrillation; stroke; cost-effectiveness

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia and the leading cause of stroke, an event with high human and economic burden. Novel oral anticoagulants have been approved in many markets as alternatives to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with AF - dabigatran etexilate, apixaban and rivaroxaban. Given the high burden of AF, and given that new treatments can more effectively prevent stroke than warfarin, but at higher drug cost, there has been a need for systematic evaluation of the costs and benefits of these new treatments. In this study, we summarize the findings of a systematic literature review on the cost-effectiveness of the new oral anticoagulants. We find that there is substantial heterogeneity between the studies and their numerical findings, despite using a common set of four trials for their clinical inputs. However, there is broad consensus among them that each of the novel oral anticoagulants is cost-effective versus warfarin or aspirin. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available