4.0 Article

Relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: Why is there no standard of care?

Journal

BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 253-259

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2013.10.005

Keywords

relapse; acute myeloid leukemia; biology; targeted therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Sunesis
  2. Merck
  3. Celgene
  4. Bristol Myers Squibb
  5. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Relapse after achieving a prior response remains one of the most important obstacles to improving the outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although overall, the majority of patients with disease relapse do poorly, this is by no means uniform and a number of predictors of outcome have been identified. Previously, most trials of investigational agents in the setting of disease relapse in AML have accrued a wide range of patients with widely different patient and disease characteristics. With increased understanding of the biology of the neoplastic change in AML, and better identification of disease subsets based on their molecular characterization, target-specific novel agents are being developed that will hopefully lead to better strategies, not only for treating relapsed disease, but also for the initial induction treatment. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available