4.3 Article

Ethnic and national stereotypes: The Princeton trilogy revisited and revised

Journal

PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 996-1010

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201278007

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three studies assessed changes in the content, consensus, and favorableness of 10 ethnic and national stereotypes by replicating and extending the Princeton trilogy. Results indicated that throughout the past 60 years, almost all of the ethnic and national stereotypes that were examined had changed in content, and more than half had changed in consensus. Most changes in consensus reflected increases rather than decreases, suggesting that modem members of stereotyped groups may confront stereotypes more frequently than did previous members of stereotyped groups. However the damaging effects that consensual stereotypes can have on members of these groups may be tempered by the finding that most of the stereotypes became more favorable. These results are discussed in terms of changing social roles, intergroup contact, and stereotype accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available