4.0 Article

The role of multiparameter flow cytometry for disease monitoring in AML

Journal

BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 379-390

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2010.06.007

Keywords

acute myeloid leukemia (AML); multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC); minimal residual disease (MRD); polymerase chain reaction (PCR); remission

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monitoring of the minimal residual disease (MRD) load has become essential for the choice of post-induction strategies in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Quantitative real-time and nested PCR guarantee highest sensitivities, but suitable markers for follow-up are available for similar to 60% of patients only: e.g. for those with reciprocal gene rearrangements or those with NPM1 mutations. On the other hand, for most AML patients, multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) represents a good option for MRD monitoring. In virtually all AML patients, leukemia-associated immunophenotypes (LAIPs) are detectable with MFC. These can be targeted with high sensitivity ranging up to 10(-4) during the course of disease. Numerous studies demonstrated the prognostic power of the MRD levels determined by MFC at post-induction as well as post-consolidation time points in adults and children considered to be in hematologic remission of AML. The post-consolidation MRD status seems to have more prognostic power than post-induction levels. Thus, MFC can significantly contribute to risk assessment of patients with AML during and after treatment and allows clinicians to consider alternative strategies (e.g. allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) earlier. Clinical studies need to focus on a standardization of these approaches to facilitate the translation of MFC-based MRD assessment into therapeutic decisions in patients with AML (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available